tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4170332600441687813.post1489936262887438809..comments2013-03-23T09:45:51.933-07:00Comments on Advances in Pencil Science: Computational SilenceMichael Tobishttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08229460438349093944noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4170332600441687813.post-13391392918673865212011-04-19T07:58:02.262-07:002011-04-19T07:58:02.262-07:00David,
It's amazing what one can find
on the...David,<br /><br />It's amazing what one can find <br />on the web courtesy of a Google search. <br /><br />Anyhow with regard to your comment on my paper, I would be<br />more than happy to show<br />you that your assessment<br />of my work is wide of the mark. <br /><br />For a quick idea of where I'm coming<br />from, you might like to<br />check out the following<br /><a href="http://www.amrita-cfd.org/doc/elsevier/executable-papers" rel="nofollow">executable paper</a>. <br /><br />But be warned, there is much more to that example than first meets the eye. Therefore<br />before reaching a snap<br />judgment, you should make the effort to digest "The world's smallest proof."<br /><br />All the best,<br /><br />James J. Quirk<br /><br />p.s. Michael with your reference to Star Trek, you might be amused to learn that I have a stepson named Tiberius. And as he was named 20+ years before I met my wife, it just goes to show that fact can be stranger than fiction.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15852152185119117873noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4170332600441687813.post-42409943266874442162008-02-12T15:19:00.000-08:002008-02-12T15:19:00.000-08:00Er, Quirk's, that is...Er, <I>Qui<B>r</B>k's</I>, that is...David B. Bensonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02917182411282836875noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4170332600441687813.post-43496838936441263132008-02-12T15:18:00.000-08:002008-02-12T15:18:00.000-08:00Unfortunately, I have yet to see a widely applicab...Unfortunately, I have yet to see a widely applicable and workable 'literate programming' framework. Don's pioneering 'web' and 'weave' just is not being used, probably for good reasons.<BR/><BR/>Quik's might work for him. I don't see his ideas as more than another step in a desirable direction.<BR/><BR/>I would be pleased to be shown otherwise.David B. Bensonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02917182411282836875noreply@blogger.com